Heavy equipment.

 

Three heavy stick propulsion with specific bearings system and three separated electric motors. However, for the better operation of the device, the three generators should be doubled with three additional generators, so there is the need of six generators where half of them would be rotate in one direction and another half in opposite direction. If the generators would be turned by 90 degrees in vertical plane than the three of them will be enough but then the electric motors can be connected to them through 90 degree angled conical gears.

Six rotors system with one rotating. The center of rotation should be slightly lower than now and the stick slightly shorter than the forces should be greater on the upper internal side of the external rim. What I was just trying to obtain placing the center of rotation in this point as it is now, was to avoid too strong vibrations and I intended to obtain smoother working of entire device but doing this I obtained to less propulsion force resulting from difference of mass length on each side of the generators. The more mass / length on upper side in rotation the more centrifugal force difference will be obtained, but this all should be however balanced in designing because there are certain limits in such a device and after crossing them this kind of propulsion may become useless.

The assumption is this: the masses that rotate stick out more at the top, so I have more mass there, more weight, more centrifugal force due to the rotating eccentric. At the bottom, however, they do not touch the rim at all, inside which they rotate, therefore they do not press on it with their weight. Another situation is at the top, where they are pressing forcefully by mass and the centrifugal force of rotation. I would like to add that the outer rim directs these masses to move along the trajectory in such a way that the situation as above occurs. All this is possible by moving the lowering of the center of rotation slightly downwards and not in the geometrical center of the rim, in the horizontal position the masses are so dimensioned that they fit the length of the chord at the height of the pivot handle. In the vertical position, the masses are not equal to the inner diameter of the rim.

I will add another explanation for the reluctant: let's say you have a bucket of water, sand or other heavy material at your disposal, then imagine that you are able to make circles in a vertical plane with this bucket, you know the force then spreads on all sides in the same direction with centrifugal force and there is no drive then any, except that the bucket is pulling your body weight in all directions. However, imagine that you are able to add sand to the bucket while it is still horizontal and moving in the upper hemisphere of the rotation, and imagine that you are removing sand from the bucket when it is on the other side horizontal so that it is moving again. was lighter then the force will not be the same in all directions, it will be greater at the top, where the centrifugal force will be magnified due to the increased mass.

This explanation does not necessarily mean that the whole system, according to this explanation, will work, because in this case, without the base on which someone is standing and rolling the bucket, the whole thing would not work, which would have to be reckoned with if the device were to be found in space, where there is a vacuum and there is no point of support. Therefore, among other things, each generator should be at least paired with the same generator, but with the opposite direction of rotation and synchronization. Which may also raise doubts among some who read this as to the effectiveness of this solution, because someone may think that this point of support is still needed, but please imagine that with a paired and synchronized system at the appropriate rotational speed, the point of support does not it is necessary because the excess and unbalanced centrifugal force causes it to hold the whole in place and even move according to the surplus force vector, even after removing the support. The kinetic energy acting on a mass is equal to the force of gravity when properly applied.

Inertial equilibrium system for propulsion.

It is an attempt to solve the problem of a drive with magnetic interaction between magnets and steel weights. The steel weights are approved on bearings and booms and are attracted by the permanent magnets beneath the plastic casing, which is assumed to take the action of lifting the casing upwards by the magnetic force caused by the centrifugal force due to the rotation of the systems around the axis vertical, and this housing, through a spring on the central shaft, will transfer the dynamic energy to the entire system. For proper operation, the system must be in dynamic equilibrium between the centrifugal and magnetic forces. Three generators arranged on the plan of an equilateral triangle ensure the stiffness of the drive and the balance of the system. The motors used are DC motors with a voltage of at least 12 V. It is a form of a powered drone in which the main characteristic is the lack of conventional propellers.

A continuation of equilibrium system shown on latest video with additional and required improvements of construction. It would be advantageous to add wheels, rollers of ball bearings under the weights that rotate, then they would not hold so much to the housing, especially over strong neodymium magnets. In one of my earlier videos, I was describing similar construction, however there was repulsion as the main interaction between two magnets static and in rotation. These systems will not be working, because there was no freedom between required parts of the system, and it was too stiff. In this solution I think, I solve this problem by leaving the external casing free in upper movement ability what can be realized applying a compressive spring. This casing will be pushing on this spring and this spring will be pushing on entire construction what can be seen exactly on this video. This casing is static only according to rotation and in assumption its mass (mass of neodymium magnets and mass of plastic construction) will be needed for propulsion in vertical axis. It will be pulled up by magnetic forces between those steel weights lying on casing and the neodymium magnets beneath this plastic casing. In fact, those weights will have some distance from the casing because of ball bearings mounted under and slightly in their capacity, along the external circumference of the casing. So, in the right and higher speed of rotation the weights may start to have some distance from the casing only if the spring will be compressed enough to give proper resistance for further compression by the casing.

If anyone thinks that this solution will not work, let him prove it. One must remember that centrifugal force is an intrinsic force, and it does not have to repel anything to become a propulsion source, unlike conventional Newtonian physics, where everything must rely on the rejection of gas or liquid for it to work. A simple example contradicting the Third Principle of Dynamics in the conventional edition, especially its misinterpretation, is presented in the attached film. In Dean's propulsor, the centrifugal force is also used, but it is generated differently, no one has refuted the foundations and assumptions of this propulsor so far, despite so many opponents, the matter remains unclear based on modern physics. Saying that something will not work without giving reasons based on constructive analysis and calculations is just as practical as saying it will.

There is another system I want to build:

This is a proposition of inertial propulsion system with only one mass. I've presented lately this system, but it was not advanced enough to a proper presentation and could not show a crucial idea of operation of this drive. One of the simplest inertia drives consists of an electric motor, a through-shaft hub and the free-position shaft itself and an outer casing. In this video you can see the shaft moving as it is forced to rotate by the motor and corrected by the outer housing. In the closing phase, rotation of the shaft already obtains sufficient energy that it no longer must be controlled by the housing. The question of friction is an open question here, in the form that is presented it is not resolved. How to lubricate this device, whether it will be work on grease or in oil mist, is an open question. Grease or oil may escape under the influence of centrifugal force and lubricate the entire device to prevent ignition. You can also use a dense roller bearing of a special design around the circumference (with needles on the inside) of the device, if the radius of curvature of the shaft tops were appropriate and it could be slightly extended to ensure contact with the needles of the bearing, the whole could work better.