A technology blog in the space industry, focusing primarily on new forms of space propulsion and addressing all issues related to their market introduction. The patent mine is affiliated with the Inertial Propulsion Research Laboratory, the author's own laboratory, where he researches the possibilities of new magnetic and inertial propulsion systems independently and using his own financial resources.
This system seems to be not properly shown in the web. So, I post it again in updated version which is inspired by my latest works and data from the Inernet, YT channels that I have already seen. If this system is working correctly, it would need some attention. This animation is not in high performance quality, I am still learning blender, so it is like it is.
When the spring is compressed in upper direction it is pushing on upper collar. The balls are trying to take most distanced position from the center of rotation, so bottom collar is pushing on the spring by application of centrifugal force. This system is paired and in assumption is to be powered by two electric motors with connection to the plug. Bottom ropes are made from steel they are loose and upper are stiff and also are made from steel. The upper ropes-rods have pivot point at the top. Balls are made from steel. They are five in number. This system is predicted to work with high RPM.
Bottom collar can be made from permanent magnet and the second bottom collar pushing on this collar can be made from also permanent magnets, so when they would be polarized on repulsion the problem of friction would be solved.
The system will be probably working only on lubrication.
This system is simulating antigravity, but not harnessing gravity only inertia and centrifugal force for generate lift.
Two AC electric motors are powering the system with rotating weights in shape of steel spheres. As the bottom permanent neodymium magnet collar is pushing on the second bottom collar also made from neodymium permanent magnet by use of centrifugal force, the spring is being compressed by the second magnet collar, this spring is pushing on top collar at the highest point of the entire system. The spring is properly stiff for giving away its mechanical energy and in my assumption converse it on lift acting on entire set. The weights are connected with bottom collars by a steel loose rope, which will be straighten during the rotation, and the upper rods are stiff. When the system starts to rotate the weights will be trying to take most distanced position to the center of rotation this will cause the pulling bottom collar in up direction, simultaneously they are guided by upper rods, which should be made from steel and have proper thickness. The whole system is powered from external source of power such as electric grid. The weights will be lifted by centrifugal force and also will be getting more distanced from the center of rotation of central axis.
Here is other kind of this propulsion with springs and chains, no stiff upper rods.
No permanent magnets are required, no second upper sliding or additional ball bearing at the bottom is needed.
This solution is predicted to simulate negative gravity based on harnessing inertial forces. The negative gravity would not be generated in form of field as we can imagine right now because it is a product of rotation of heavy weights on which the centrifugal force is acting. The negative gravity will be appearing like inertial mechanic force acting in the center of device on central axis in form of pressure on centrally located collar. The force coming from centrifugal force by use of rotation acting on the spring is in this case not compensated. Centrifugal force will be trying to displace the bottom collar toward the top of the device by use of mechanic forces coming from rotation of the weights, collar is the point where the chains are attached at the bottom (chains are those arms on which are main masses attached in green color). This collar has an ability to move on central axis because it has eight ball bearings placed in proper holes in sliding part underneath this collar. The full system has only one axis of rotation in each generator. During the spring is compressed in upper direction it is encountering on its way the obstacle in form of second collar made on the same central axis. The axis is rounded partially but not completely allowing the bearings in sliding system to stay on their positions. When the central spring is making push on the obstacle it will be pushing on this obstacle by use of its upper edge, and the more it is compressed the more force will be generated in form of pressure on the obstacle. The second upper part of the rotor on which the weights are attached from the top side of the device has not an ability to move, so in assumption the result force will be trying to push the bottom collar by pull of the rotating masses toward the outside of the device by centrifugal force. This as I had said will provide the lift of bottom collar what with application of the spring should in assumption generate the lift of entire system, this is the only move the system will make besides main rotation and compression of the spring. System is consisting of three such a rotor, each have one AC electric motor with electronic speed control. I will try this solution, so I could say clearly if it is working or not. This is not safe device in operation because the rotors should rotate with at least 3000 rpm.
I want to add some information about my prediction according three independent ball inertial system driven magnetically. The simplicity of this system is based on simultaneous magnetic attraction between balls and centrifugal force acting in this system creating by the same magnetic interaction. Electromagnets will be creating circular rotating magnetic field at the bottom of each propulsion unit in number of three. Electromagnets will be accelerating the balls, and the balls will be climbing by application of centrifugal force upon external casing from the inside inclined slightly to the up aimed main axis. The two-directional interaction between balls and the electromagnets would be responsible for linear approximate thrust which should occur during the rotation because of centrifugal force acting.
The vibrations coming from every single unit will be canceled by joined acting of three generators. The inclination of the walls - external casing should be chosen carefully and with proper calculation. The generators should be closed at the upper part not allowing to escape the balls outside the walls. The entire system should have an electronic control allowing for continuous increasing the speed of rotation of the balls, thus the system can work on equilibrium point all the time.
An idea of rotor technology that I predict to use in my inventions. The rotating weights have one or two ball bearings on each end sliding on internal surface of external rim helping to avoid friction. They are carried by rods which are passing through them along and inside in drilled holes for this aim, which are rectangle in cross section. Central rotor has eight arms, and they are passing through the center of each weight in drilled holes for this aim, they have bearings too and this is a specific system of bearings which here is not visible. This system is predicted and optimized to convert centrifugal force during the rotation of the rotor, to linear up aimed force for overcome gravity acting on entire system - hypothetical vehicle, which will be consisting of several such an inertial propulsion system. This system is simulating antigravity, but it is not antigravity propelled. This system is more plausible because it is oriented for obtaining maximal centrifugal force coming from the specific shape of each weight (most of the mass is located on the ends of the weights maximally far from the center of rotation so it is located in the right place for obtaining maximal centrifugal force during the rotation of the system). In case of the roller-based system a part of mass is located near of the center of rotation of the generator, so the system with conical weights is probably better solution if someone is willing to obtain the inertial propulsion force from rotation of the weights. In the case of conical weights rotor, in lower part of the device, the weights are near each other, and they are close to center of rotation, so centrifugal force should be weaker than in upper hemisphere of rotation where they are on far extension. I need bigger CNC milling machine for making a right scaled prototype because this milling machine that I have is allowing me right now for making only small parts and is not suitable for machining of durable steel. I need to rebuild my workshop for more complex goals. I will try to build a drone consisting of three such generators with additional control of electronic equipment and electric motors as a main source of mechanical force.
At the below animation that I made in blender 4.1 for better understanding what is going on here if we consider inertial and centrifugal forces, I am presenting movement of weights during the rotation of the system of propulsion. If somebody have proper software one can calculate and simulate physical relationships and tendencies in such a system. This system is on maximal usable extension in upper direction, so it can block itself if the bearings will be not properly applicated. The extension should be not so big for smoother working of the device. The device is almost optimal but naturally could be a little improved if somebody has more data and is able to calculate the proper dimension and relationships.
Rotor technology based on centrifugal force distribution control. Like my earlier inventions this is also based on centrifugal force control. The system is consisting of eight rollers made from steel, each with double ball bearings on each side on main symmetry axis. External rim is predicted to make the trajectory to these rollers what with not centrally placed central wheel with profiled hollow ring in which the rollers have an opportunity to hide in bottom position during the movement around the indicated track. Why eight? Because eight rollers are most suitable for such a solution when three of them are in production of force at the top of the device simultaneously other three are in lowest position and there is no asymmetry in the system beside the required asymmetry in up - down direction, as usual two rollers are inactive for production of force. The central wheel with profiled groove around is in 'H' shape in vertical cross section so the rollers can hide partially in this groove.
